January 2012 |November 2011 |September 2011 |July 2011 |May 2011 |March 2011 |February 2011 |January 2011 |December 2010 |November 2010 |October 2010 |September 2010 | July 2010 | June 2010 | May 2010 | April 2010 | March 2010 | February 2010 | January 2010 | December 2009 | November Update 2009 | November 2009 | September 2009 | August 2009 | July 2009 | April 2009 (PDF) | Contact us |

Save Our Shoreline, November 2010

The Victorian Promenade from Havre des Pas to La Collette. Soon to be widened at four points, have the shelter removed, and to become the 'Emergency Access Road'.

Last month we reported on rubbish piled up on the rock bund alongside the western boundary of the Channel Island's first Ramsar Wetland of International Importance. At a Ramsar Management Authority meeting last month (12th October, 2010) Save Our Shoreline had this accepted as an agenda item and we are pleased to report that Transport and Technical Services (TTS) were given four weeks to clear it up.

The same Department last week applied to Planning and Environment for permission to start work on the beach this December, in order to widen the Victorian promenade at four points - necessary for emergency service vehicles should a major incident occur at La Collette (see our September Edition). The beach is in a Ramsar Area and is ecologically sensitive. Resident and over-wintering birds rely on the area for their food source, which could well be under threat when large volumes of heated and treated cooling water are pumped into the bay. TTS still rely on a flawed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in their planning application. The Department were heavily criticised last year in a major report by the Environmental Scrutiny Panel and independent advisers Bioscan UK for not undertaking a satisfactory Environmental Impact Assessment in respect of the incinerator project as a whole, the Island's largest capital project to date.

The 'Emergency Access Road' was passed in principle under Reserved Matters at the same time as the incinerator was approved. TTS have ticked boxes on the application to confirm that the plans were advertised to the public (see here) and that there was public consultation. ('Consultation' in 2008 was to a selected few, and rather in the form of presentations of how wonderful the incinerator would be).

The plans were not advertised in the JEP Gazette (as far as we can ascertain). We have written to Mr. Richard Glover, Acting Assistant Director Performance and Operations, and we will update you when we receive his reply. Consultation did not take place with the concessionaires who run cafes on the promenade. When we met the concessionaires in September they had still not been consulted. And, it goes without saying, the Ramsar Bureau has once again been ignored regarding their input. We also wonder why the National Trust has not been approached regarding the finer details of any Victorian features that may be altered?

Below: Four species of wading bird commonly seen in the western corner of Havre des Pas. From left: curlew, oystercatcher, little egret, redshank. In the 'corner' of Havre des Pas, directly below the incinerator, can be found a rich variety of bird and marine life.



THE WATER DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATIONS

The Regulator has recently issued permits for several water discharge permits. One of which, the cooling water from the new plant disturbs us due to its probable effect on the marine ecology of the bay. Details of the discharge can be found in our June edition.

SOS has requested a review of this permit under provisions made in the Water Pollution (Jersey) Law 2000. The Regulator mistakenly informed members of the Ramsar Management Authority at a meeting on 12th October, 2010, that his decision was final. He also said that he had not notified the panel of his decison for 14 days because 'he was not obliged to'. Later in the meeting, having had the relevant part of the law pointed out to him by our colleague, Mrs. Lara Luke, the Regulator admitted his error and the correct situation was confirmed by the Chairman, who is also the Assistant Planning Minister. The Chairman also admonished the Regulator for not extending the Panel members the courtesy of informing them of his decision earlier. There are good reasons why the discharge permit should be challenged and we hope that they will be listened to. The Regulator's delay in notifying us of his decision and other factors have impeded the time scale for the review process, but we will persevere. If we cannot get a Judical Review we will take the matter to Environmental Scrutiny who are about to conduct a review on regulatory matters with regard to the marine environment.

The spreadsheet containing submissions from the Ramsar Management Authority Technical Subgroup, Save Our Shoreline, the Environmental Scrutiny Panel, Health Protection and others, replies by the operators Transport and Technical Services, and the decisions reached by the Regulator can be downloaded here.


POLLUTION EVENTS IN THE SPRING OF 2009 AT THE INCINERATOR SITE

18 months have elapsed since this extended 'incident' happened, and still silence reigns. SOS will soon examine the initial TTS report on these pollution events during construction of the incinerator.



Save Our Shoreline, November 2010
Working to protect our marine environment.

Find us on Facebook and comment on any of our posts. Or simply show your support by sending us a friend request!
Just click on the logo below.

Save Our Shoreline Jersey


Email us

January 2012 |November 2011 |September 2011 |July 2011 |May 2011 |March 2011 | February 2011 |January 2011 | December 2010 |November 2010 |October 2010 |September 2010 | July 2010 | June 2010 | May 2010 | April 2010 | March 2010 | February 2010 | January 2010 (Eyewitness Report EfW) | December 2009 | November 2009 Update | November 2009 | September 2009 | August 2009 | July 2009 | April 2009 Press Release